News: Congress Publish H. R. 1044 Bill

<div class=”generated-html-container “>

 
<table class=”lbexTableStyleSix”><tbody><tr><td class=”lbexTdStyleThree”><div style=”text-align:center”>
116th CONGRESS 1st Session
</div></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table class=”lbexTableStyleFour”>
<tbody><tr><td></td></tr>
<tr><td></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style=”text-align:center”>H. R. 1044</div>

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the per-country numerical limitation for
employment-based immigrants, to increase the per-country numerical
limitation for family-sponsored immigrants, and for other purposes.
<hr style=”width:40%”>

<div style=”text-align:center”>IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</div>
<div style=”text-align:center”>

February 7, 2019
</div>
<div style=”text-align:left;” class=”lbexHang”>Ms. Lofgren (for herself, Mr. Buck, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Barr, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Bera, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Bonamici, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Ms. Brownley of California, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Cárdenas, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Comer, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Costa, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Cox of California, Mr. Crow, Mr. Curtis, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Deutch, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Emmer, Mr. Engel, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Estes, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Foster, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Miss González-Colón of Puerto Rico, Mr. Guest, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Harder of California, Ms. Herrera Beutler, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Hill of Arkansas, Mr. Hurd of Texas, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Ms. Johnson of Texas, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Katko, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Kind, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Kinzinger, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Lawson of Florida, Mr. Long, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Malinowski, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Massie, Ms. Matsui, Mrs. McBath, Ms. McCollum, Mr. McEachin, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. Rodgers of Washington, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Ms. Moore, Mr. Morelle, Mr. Norman, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Perry, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Raskin, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. Riggleman, Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Shalala, Mr. Sires, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Soto, Ms. Speier, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Takano, Ms. Titus, Mr. Tonko, Mrs. Torres of California, Mr. Upton, Mrs. Wagner, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Welch, Mr. Westerman, Ms. Wild, Mr. Woodall, Mr. Yarmuth, Mr. Young, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Aguilar, and Mrs. Murphy) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary</div>

<hr style=”width:40%”>

<div style=”text-align:center”>A BILL</div>

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the per-country numerical limitation for
employment-based immigrants, to increase the per-country numerical
limitation for family-sponsored immigrants, and for other purposes.

 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, <a id=”HDD57E34AFB1646EF91D1A53F63BFF82A”> </a>SECTION 1. Short title.<div style=”text-align:left” class=”lbexIndent”>This Act may be cited as the “Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019”.</div><a id=”HDCB4F85197924EE49464E9A5C015B3B3″> </a>SEC. 2. Numerical limitation to any single foreign state.<div style=”text-align:left” class=”lbexIndent”></div><a id=”HDE14A696C5B94106802468B1FCDDA887″> </a>(a) In general.—Section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1152″>8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)</a>) is amended—<a id=”HD0F5652521C9436F937A365F0ABF0983″> </a>(1) in the paragraph heading, by striking “and employment-based”;<a id=”H3EEAD200B68147E4950542A92B814C2F”> </a>(2) by striking “(3), (4), and (5),” and inserting “(3) and (4),”;<a id=”HA3F70F4F2A1D41ADAB241D12FB880FA9″> </a>(3) by striking “subsections (a) and (b) of section 203” and inserting “section 203(a)”;<a id=”H61523C8E562A48FFB4443008E42AC3C6″> </a>(4) by striking “7” and inserting “15”; and<a id=”HD9D05645CBE54420B29EEC1BBDC6D22E”> </a>(5) by striking “such subsections” and inserting “such section”.<a id=”H766DE9103E6444249A448CF08B493829″> </a>(b) Conforming amendments.—Section 202 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1152″>8 U.S.C. 1152</a>) is amended—<a id=”H1A19C4767EB44F7FB35CC8A9A7E99072″> </a>(1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking “both subsections (a) and (b) of section 203” and inserting “section 203(a)”;<a id=”HD8BE3BDF4A00497A9BE0E65AA5FB1EE7″> </a>(2) by striking subsection (a)(5); and<a id=”HB644578F29854F1B99BA44A8EDB39CCC”> </a>(3) by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:<a id=”HBBCEF08426C7495BAB45B2D882982F7B”> </a>“(e) Special rules for countries at ceiling.—If it is determined that the total number of immigrant visas made available under section 203(a) to natives of any single foreign state or dependent area will exceed the numerical limitation specified in subsection (a)(2) in any fiscal year, in determining the allotment of immigrant visa numbers to natives under section 203(a), visa numbers with respect to natives of that state or area shall be allocated (to the extent practicable and otherwise consistent with this section and section 203) in a manner so that, except as provided in subsection (a)(4), the proportion of the visa numbers made available under each of paragraphs (1) through (4) of section 203(a) is equal to the ratio of the total number of visas made available under the respective paragraph to the total number of visas made available under section 203(a).”.<a id=”H747B8069D8304E3CABC75DC0F4361D08″> </a>(c) Country-Specific offset.—Section 2 of the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992 (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1255″>8 U.S.C. 1255</a> note) is amended—<a id=”H56ABE6484AAD4268BAEF3A4593A1795E”> </a>(1) in subsection (a), by striking “subsection (e))” and inserting “subsection (d))”; and<a id=”H0DC6C92EB30C4C35B24922E0585C8A3B”> </a>(2) by striking subsection (d) and redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).<a id=”H01F85D2DC39C4FAC918E76B8A9642239″> </a>(d) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect as if enacted on September 30, 2019, and shall apply to fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2020.<a id=”HB7C786A377BC4674AF069CB7FBF64E3A”> </a>(e) Transition rules for employment-Based immigrants.—<a id=”H98B63FC1886544EA8F82E7FF99CFF62E”> </a>(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the succeeding paragraphs of this subsection and notwithstanding title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1151″>8 U.S.C. 1151</a> et seq.), the following rules shall apply:<a id=”HED8CB82684D0413BAD85844F2AC04608″> </a>(A) For fiscal year 2020, 15 percent of the immigrant visas made available under each of paragraphs (2), (3), and (5) of section 203(b) of such Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1153″>8 U.S.C. 1153(b)</a>) shall be allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area that is not one of the two states with the largest aggregate numbers of natives who are beneficiaries of approved petitions for immigrant status under such paragraphs.<a id=”H1D1BE3E670814FDA9A83C5CCB29FA024″> </a>(B) For fiscal year 2021, 10 percent of the immigrant visas made available under each of such paragraphs shall be allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area that is not one of the two states with the largest aggregate numbers of natives who are beneficiaries of approved petitions for immigrant status under such paragraphs.<a id=”H0789E740F6D64F8EB1ED412F125CB392″> </a>(C) For fiscal year 2022, 10 percent of the immigrant visas made available under each of such paragraphs shall be allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area that is not one of the two states with the largest aggregate numbers of natives who are beneficiaries of approved petitions for immigrant status under such paragraphs.<a id=”H60117F971C4E4FB99FAA0DD580482EF6″> </a>(2) PER-COUNTRY LEVELS.—<a id=”HAE207CD85A684D62AF92FC489260E18A”> </a>(A) RESERVED VISAS.—With respect to the visas reserved under each of subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1), the number of such visas made available to natives of any single foreign state or dependent area in the appropriate fiscal year may not exceed 25 percent (in the case of a single foreign state) or 2 percent (in the case of a dependent area) of the total number of such visas.<a id=”H2C049085B69A443D99E0EFF42717F31A”> </a>(B) UNRESERVED VISAS.—With respect to the immigrant visas made available under each of paragraphs (2), (3), and (5) of section 203(b) of such Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1153″>8 U.S.C. 1153(b)</a>) and not reserved under paragraph (1), for each of fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022, not more than 85 percent shall be allotted to immigrants who are natives of any single foreign state.<a id=”H5969ECCE761A4A588B4C6D7AE1B5B4B7″> </a>(3) SPECIAL RULE TO PREVENT UNUSED VISAS.—If, with respect to fiscal year 2020, 2021, or 2022, the operation of paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection would prevent the total number of immigrant visas made available under paragraph (2) or (3) of section 203(b) of such Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1153″>8 U.S.C. 1153(b)</a>) from being issued, such visas may be issued during the remainder of such fiscal year without regard to paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection.<a id=”H9D143B3E185F48668853851E7BE69373″> </a>(4) TRANSITION RULE FOR CURRENTLY APPROVED BENEFICIARIES.—<a id=”HD4D188A6CC1E4EAC9826B2B0BA534C26″> </a>(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 202 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by this Act, immigrant visas under section 203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1153″>8 U.S.C. 1153(b)</a>) shall be allocated such that no alien described in subparagraph (B) receives a visa later than the alien otherwise would have received said visa had this Act not been enacted.<a id=”H25F425C3A89D48889F1A40EADF122B89″> </a>(B) ALIEN DESCRIBED.—An alien is described in this subparagraph if the alien is the beneficiary of a petition for an immigrant visa under section 203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1153″>8 U.S.C. 1153(b)</a>) that was approved prior to the date of enactment of this Act.<a id=”H6EBB94A15E8844CE8E4C75C8C715CFBE”> </a>(5) RULES FOR CHARGEABILITY.—Section 202(b) of such Act (<a href=”http://uscode.house.gov/quicksearch/get.plx?title=8&section=1152”>8 U.S.C. 1152(b)</a>) shall apply in determining the foreign state to which an alien is chargeable for purposes of this subsection.
<hr>

</div>
{$inline_image

You May Also Be Interested In:

Legal Alert Title

May 11 – Permanent Residency, House Bill

Article: Obtaining I-551 Stamp as Evidence of Conditional Lawful Permanent Residency during COVID-19 By Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP

Article: Stuck Abroad And Unable To Return To The U.S. Within 180 Days? By David H. Nachman, Esq., Michael Phulwani, Esq. and Ludka Zimovcak, Esq.

May 8 – Travel Restrictions, COVID-19

May 7 – Top Articles And News For April 2020

Article: Recommendations for U.S.C.I.S. Reopening Offices during Covid-19 By Alan Lee, Esq.

Article: COVID-19 Exacerbates Form I-829 Processing Pain for EB-5 Investors, Mandamus Lawsuits Growing in Popularity By Matt Galati

May 6 – Healthcare Immigration Now

News: Congress Publish H. R. 1044 Bill

You May Also Be Interested In:

Footer