• Home
  • About Us
    • Stacy E. Cozart Martin
    • Michael M. Jolic
    • Scott Bratton
    • Staff
  • Services
    • Non-Immigrant Visas
      • E-1/E-2 Visas
      • H-1B Visas
      • H-1B visas for Physicians
      • H-2B Visas
      • J-1 Visa Waivers
      • L-1A and L-1B Non-immigrant Visas
      • O-1 Visa
      • The TN for Professionals
    • Immigrant Visas
      • EB-11 Alien of Extraordinary Ability
      • EB-12 Outstanding Professors or Researchers
      • Multi-National Executive or Manager Category
      • Immigrant Investors/Employment Creation Visas
      • Immigration Issues for Physicians
      • National Interest Waivers (NIW)
      • National Interest Waiver for Physicians Working in Medically Underserved Areas
      • Permanent Residency based on Labor Certification (PERM)
      • I-9 Services
    • Asylum, Deportation, Removal and Crimmigration
      • Asylum
      • Removal Proceedings
      • Crimmigration
      • Bond
      • Appeals – Board of Immigration Appeals
      • Federal Appeals
      • Federal Litigation in District Courts
      • I-601A/I-212
      • Motion to Reopen
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Mobile Menu

Schedule A Consultation Now!

Give us a call to speak with an immigration attorney.

(216) 328-9878

  • Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Speak with an Immigration Attorney  (216) 328-9878

MJB Immigration

Immigration Attorneys

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Non-Immigrant Visas
      • E-1/E-2 Visas
      • H-1B Visas
      • H-1B Visas for Physicians
      • H-2B Visas
      • J-1 Visa Waivers
      • L-1A and L-1B Visas
      • O-1 Visas
      • The TN for Professionals
    • Immigrant Visas
      • EB-11 Visas
      • EB-12 Visas
      • Multi-National Executive or Manager Category
      • Immigrant Investors/Employment Creation Visas
      • Immigration Issues for Physicians
      • National Interest Waivers (NIW)
      • National Interest Waiver for Physicians Working in Medically Underserved Areas
      • Permanent Residency based on Labor Certification (PERM)
      • I-9 Services
    • Asylum, Deportation, Removal and Crimmigration
      • Asylum
      • Removal Proceedings
      • Crimmigration
      • Bond
      • Appeals – Board of Immigration Appeals
      • Federal Appeals
      • Federal Litigation in District Courts
      • I-601A/I-212
      • Motion to Reopen
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Article: USCIS Visa Petition Denials on the Rise By Tory Johnson

August 29, 2019

<div itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Article”>
<h3 itemprop=”name”>
<!–ARTICLE TITLE START–>
USCIS Visa Petition Denials on the Rise
<!–END ARTICLE TITLE–>
</h3><h4><i>by <a href=”http://discuss.ilw.com/articles/articles/391548-article-uscis-visa-petition-denials-on-the-rise-by-tory-johnson#bio”>
<span itemprop=”author” itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Person”>
<span itemprop=”name”>
<!–AUTHOR NAME START–>
Tory Johnson
<!–END AUTHOR NAME–>
</span></span>
</a></i></h4><br/>

<span itemprop=”articleBody”>
<article id=”post-30972″ class=”module single-post-module post-30972 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-business-immigration category-economics-immigration category-employment-based-immigration tag-u-s-citizenship-and-immigration-services et-has-post-format-content et_post_format-et-post-format-standard”>

<div class=”post-thumbnail header”>
<img src=”http://immigrationimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/immigration-impact-uscis-says-marijuana-denied-1280×640.jpg” alt=”USCIS Visa Petition Denials on the Rise”> </div>

<div class=”post-wrap”>
<div class=”post-content entry-content”>
<div class=”at-above-post addthis_tool” data-url=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/08/16/uscis-denying-more-visa-petitions/”></div><p>Legal immigration channels to the United States are continuing to suffer under the Trump administration. These restrictions are having an effect on employment-based immigration—particularly petitions for temporary foreign workers.</p>
<p>American businesses file such petitions in order to hire and retain foreign-born workers who make vital contributions to companies, industries, and the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>Yet U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is denying and scrutinizing some of the most relied-upon petitions at a higher rate than in the past. USCIS data through June 2019 show a clear uptick in denials and requests for evidence (RFEs) for <a href=”https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Resources/Reports%20and%20Studies/Immigration%20Forms%20Data/BAHA/H-1B_Quarterly_Request_for_Evidence_RFE_FY2015-FY2019_Q3.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>H-1B and L-1 petitions</a>.</p>
<p>In the first three quarters of the current fiscal year (ending October 1), USCIS denied 16.1% of initial H-1B petitions. That <a href=”https://www.natlawreview.com/article/requests-evidence-and-visa-denials-continue-to-climb-2019″ target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>denial rate is nearly four times higher</a> than it was in FY 2015. The denial rate has experienced a steady increase each year since FY 2015.</p>
<p><a href=”https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Resources/Reports%20and%20Studies/Immigration%20Forms%20Data/BAHA/H-1B_Quarterly_Request_for_Evidence_RFE_FY2015-FY2019_Q3.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>USCIS denied 28% of initial L-1 petitions</a> in the first three quarters of FY 2019. That <a href=”https://www.natlawreview.com/article/requests-evidence-and-visa-denials-continue-to-climb-2019″ target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>denial rate is significantly</a> higher than what it was in the past four fiscal years.</p>
<p>USCIS also is issuing more RFEs, essentially asking for additional documents to confirm the validity of the application. While seeking additional evidence may seem minor, in practice RFEs may add months to an already arduous process that can hinder an employer’s ability to plan and meet business needs.</p>
<p>The <a href=”https://www.natlawreview.com/article/requests-evidence-and-visa-denials-continue-to-climb-2019″ target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>RFE rate for H-1B petitions</a> has increased by 78% in the last five years, reaching almost 40% in the first three quarters of FY 2019 compared to 22 and 21% in FYs 2015 and 2016, respectively. And even when petitioners respond with additional information, increasingly USCIS maintains the denial. In FY 2019 (as of June), only 63% of H-1B petitions were approved after an RFE was issued, compared to 83% in FY 2015.</p>
<p>The <a href=”https://www.natlawreview.com/article/requests-evidence-and-visa-denials-continue-to-climb-2019″ target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>RFE rate for L-1 petitions</a> is even higher, nearing 54% in the first three quarters of FY 2019. By comparison, the L-1 RFE rate was just 34% in FY 2015. Again, even after responding to the RFE, many petitions are still denied—the approval has been about 50% since FY 2017.</p>
<p>USCIS denials for these groups have been increasing under the Trump administration, most noticeably after the president’s Buy American, Hire American executive order. Critics further point to changes USCIS made—without congressional involvement—<a href=”https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2019/08/08/latest-uscis-data-show-increase-in-denials-for-new-h-1b-visas/#444e54ca7cc4″ target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>that affect how the agency evaluates and adjudicates these petitions</a>.</p>
<p>USCIS released some information in 2018 regarding reasons for issuing denials and RFEs. The most common reason USCIS issued an RFE in 2018 for H-1B petitions was because the position did not satisfy the “specialty occupation” definition or criteria.</p>
<p>The administration issued new guidance in 2018 that significantly <a href=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2018/05/10/uscis-restrict-speciality-occupation-workers/#.XVRrKOhKhnk” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>affected the understanding of “specialty occupations</a>.” The changes were prominent and controversial, in part due to predictions that it would further restrict U.S. businesses’ ability to hire and retain talented workers born outside the country.</p>
<p>Many <a href=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/01/28/businesses-fighting-uscis-h1b-specialty-occupation/#.XVRrG-hKhnk” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>businesses are fighting these denials</a> and pushing back on the policies enabling USCIS to adjudicate petitions with a narrow interpretation of the rules.</p>
<p>While some petitions are still moving through USCIS, it is clear that rising denial rates has become a persistent trend. For many American businesses, this trend is one that fosters uncertainty and presents additional challenges to achieving their goals and contributing to the modern economy.</p>
<!– AddThis Advanced Settings above via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Advanced Settings below via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Share Buttons above via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Share Buttons below via filter on the_content –><div class=”at-below-post addthis_tool” data-url=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/08/16/uscis-denying-more-visa-petitions/”></div><!– AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Related Posts below via filter on the_content –><div class=”at-below-post-recommended addthis_tool”></div><!– AddThis Related Posts generic via filter on the_content –> <p>

</p>
FILED UNDER: <a href=”http://immigrationimpact.com/tag/u-s-citizenship-and-immigration-services/” rel=”tag”>USCIS</a><br> </div>
</div>

</article>

<p>This post originally appeared on <a href=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/08/16/uscis-denying-more-visa-petitions/#.XWg5LOhKhPa” target=”_blank”>Immigration Impact</a>. Reprinted with permission.</p>
</span>

<hr/><h4>
<a name=”bio”></a>
About The Author<br/>
</h4>

<!–AUTHOR BIO START–>

<p>
<b>Tory Johnson</b> is the author of Immigration Impact.

<!–END AUTHOR BIO–>
<p><hr/>
<div class=”ilwFinePrint”>The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of <span itemprop=”publisher” itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Organization”>
<span itemprop=”name”>ILW.COM</span></span>.</div></p>
</div>
{$inline_image

Filed Under: Uncategorised

You May Also Be Interested In:

Legal Alert Title

May 11 – Permanent Residency, House Bill

Article: Obtaining I-551 Stamp as Evidence of Conditional Lawful Permanent Residency during COVID-19 By Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP

Article: Stuck Abroad And Unable To Return To The U.S. Within 180 Days? By David H. Nachman, Esq., Michael Phulwani, Esq. and Ludka Zimovcak, Esq.

May 8 – Travel Restrictions, COVID-19

May 7 – Top Articles And News For April 2020

Article: Recommendations for U.S.C.I.S. Reopening Offices during Covid-19 By Alan Lee, Esq.

Article: COVID-19 Exacerbates Form I-829 Processing Pain for EB-5 Investors, Mandamus Lawsuits Growing in Popularity By Matt Galati

May 6 – Healthcare Immigration Now

Previous Post: « Aug 28 – Jobs in California, Texas and Ohio
Next Post: News: Increasing Numbers &amp;quot;Remain in Mexico&amp;quot; Awaiting Immigration Court Hearings »

Primary Sidebar

Have a Quick Question?

Send us a message and one of our immigration attorneys will respond to you within 24 hours.

Footer

Martin Jolic and Bratton LLC (formerly known as Sharon & Kálnoki LLC) is a full service Cleveland-based immigration law practice. We offer representation for almost all immigrant and nonimmigrant processes to clients worldwide.

Phone: (216) 328-9878
Fax: (216) 328-9879
Email: info@mjbimmigration.com

6050 Oak Tree Blvd., Suite 250
Independence, Ohio 44131

AILA Member Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Site Footer

Attorney advertising. This website is informational only. Information provided herein does not address any specific set of individual facts. Each immigration case is unique and nothing on this or associated pages, documents, forms, comments, e-mails, articles or other communication constitutes legal advice for any individual case or situation. Information provided on this site is not intended as a substitute for legal advice directed to a particular set of circumstances. Legal advice on specific, individual cases should be obtained from an experienced immigration attorney. In exchange for using this site to gather information, you agree not to hold any person involved in the preparation and presentation of this site responsible or liable, either directly or indirectly, for any damages whatsoever that may arise from the use, misuse, and/or reliance on anything contained within this site. Viewing or using information presented on this website is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship will be created only upon the express agreement of the parties.

Copyright © 2021