• Home
  • About Us
    • Stacy E. Cozart Martin
    • Michael M. Jolic
    • Scott Bratton
    • Staff
  • Services
    • Non-Immigrant Visas
      • E-1/E-2 Visas
      • H-1B Visas
      • H-1B visas for Physicians
      • H-2B Visas
      • J-1 Visa Waivers
      • L-1A and L-1B Non-immigrant Visas
      • O-1 Visa
      • The TN for Professionals
    • Immigrant Visas
      • EB-11 Alien of Extraordinary Ability
      • EB-12 Outstanding Professors or Researchers
      • Multi-National Executive or Manager Category
      • Immigrant Investors/Employment Creation Visas
      • Immigration Issues for Physicians
      • National Interest Waivers (NIW)
      • National Interest Waiver for Physicians Working in Medically Underserved Areas
      • Permanent Residency based on Labor Certification (PERM)
      • I-9 Services
    • Asylum, Deportation, Removal and Crimmigration
      • Asylum
      • Removal Proceedings
      • Crimmigration
      • Bond
      • Appeals – Board of Immigration Appeals
      • Federal Appeals
      • Federal Litigation in District Courts
      • I-601A/I-212
      • Motion to Reopen
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Mobile Menu

Schedule A Consultation Now!

Give us a call to speak with an immigration attorney.

(216) 328-9878

  • Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Speak with an Immigration Attorney  (216) 328-9878

MJB Immigration

Immigration Attorneys

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Non-Immigrant Visas
      • E-1/E-2 Visas
      • H-1B Visas
      • H-1B Visas for Physicians
      • H-2B Visas
      • J-1 Visa Waivers
      • L-1A and L-1B Visas
      • O-1 Visas
      • The TN for Professionals
    • Immigrant Visas
      • EB-11 Visas
      • EB-12 Visas
      • Multi-National Executive or Manager Category
      • Immigrant Investors/Employment Creation Visas
      • Immigration Issues for Physicians
      • National Interest Waivers (NIW)
      • National Interest Waiver for Physicians Working in Medically Underserved Areas
      • Permanent Residency based on Labor Certification (PERM)
      • I-9 Services
    • Asylum, Deportation, Removal and Crimmigration
      • Asylum
      • Removal Proceedings
      • Crimmigration
      • Bond
      • Appeals – Board of Immigration Appeals
      • Federal Appeals
      • Federal Litigation in District Courts
      • I-601A/I-212
      • Motion to Reopen
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Article: California Bans Private Prisons, Eliminating Immigration Detention Centers That Incarcerate 4,000 People By Katy Murdza

October 17, 2019

<div itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Article”>
<h3 itemprop=”name”>
<!–ARTICLE TITLE START–>
California Bans Private Prisons, Eliminating Immigration Detention Centers That Incarcerate 4,000 People<!–END ARTICLE TITLE–>
</h3><h4><i>by <a href=”http://discuss.ilw.com/articles/articles/391889-article-california-bans-private-prisons-eliminating-immigration-detention-centers-that-incarcerate-4-000-people-by-katy-murdza#bio”>
<span itemprop=”author” itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Person”>
<span itemprop=”name”>
<!–AUTHOR NAME START–>
Katy Murdza<!–END AUTHOR NAME–>
</span></span>
</a></i></h4><br/>

<span itemprop=”articleBody”>

<div class=”post-content entry-content”>
<div class=”at-above-post addthis_tool” data-url=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/10/16/california-bans-private-prisons-immigration-detention-centers/”></div><p>California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law on Friday that will phase out private prisons—including federal immigration detention centers—throughout the state. The new law, AB 32, prohibits the state government and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from creating, modifying, or renewing prison contracts with private companies beginning on January 1, 2020.</p>
<p>The law orders the complete elimination of <a href=”https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/12/politics/california-law-ban-private-for-profit-prisons/index.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>California’s private prisons</a> by 2028, but the contracts of the four existing immigration detention centers in the state are set to expire within the next year. These facilities currently hold approximately 4,000 immigrants and are run by for-profit, private prison companies such as GEO Group and CoreCivic. After the private facilities close, the Yuba County Jail will have the last remaining ICE contract in California.</p>
<p>The new California law goes the furthest in the United States in limiting immigration detention.</p>
<p>Illinois <a href=”https://psmag.com/news/illinois-is-cracking-down-on-private-immigration-detention” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>banned local government</a> transactions with private detention centers earlier this year but does not prevent ICE from contracting directly with corporations. Several states have banned private contracts in the criminal justice system without affecting immigration detention.</p>
<p>California had already <a href=”https://www.freedomforimmigrants.org/news/2019/10/11/ca-gov-gavin-newsom-signs-bill-banning-private-prisons-into-law” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>demonstrated leadership</a> in limiting private detention facilities. In 2017, the Dignity Not Detention Act prevented local governments from expanding private immigration detention contracts. The law also expanded state oversight over existing detention centers.</p>
<p><a href=”https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/us/prisons-immigration-detention.html”>About 70%</a> of the approximately 50,000 people in immigration detention in the United States are held in private facilities. Private detention incentivizes unnecessary increases in the U.S. detention population when <a href=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2015/07/22/evidence-shows-asylum-seekers-appear-for-court-with-alternatives-to-detention-and-legal-assistance/#.XacrkedKgWo” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>alternatives to detention have proven effective</a>. These alternatives cost about <a href=”https://www.aila.org/infonet/the-real-alternatives-to-detention” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>$4 per day per person, compared to $139 for adult detention, and $319 for family detention</a>.</p>
<p>Advocates and government watchdogs have long denounced dangerous conditions at for-profit detention centers around the country.</p>
<p>This summer, the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of the Inspector General issued a <a href=”https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2019-06/OIG-19-47-Jun19.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>report</a> on egregious violations of government standards in four detention centers, including the Adelanto detention center in California. Inspectors found nooses in detainee cells, food safety issues, and inappropriate segregation practices.</p>
<p>Advocacy organizations have filed many complaints on a wide range of problems at other for-profit facilities, including conditions for <a href=”https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/advocacy/detained-pregnant-women” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>pregnant women</a>, the practice of detaining <a href=”https://immigrationjustice.us/advocacy/advocacy-issues/access-to-medical-mental-health-care/complaint-urges-immediate-release-of-infants-from-detention/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>infants</a>, and <a href=”https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/news/complaint-filed-dhs-oversight-bodies-calls-improvements-medical-and-mental-health-care” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>inadequate medical care</a>.</p>
<p>Last week’s law is a huge step toward limiting immigration detention, but much will depend on what comes next.</p>
<p>If the detention centers do close, it is crucial that ICE respond by releasing people instead of just transferring them to other parts of the country. Transfers could take people to even more remote locations with less access to attorneys and less state oversight. For this reason, a <a href=”https://www.brookings.edu/research/how-states-can-improve-americas-immigration-system/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>recent report</a> recommended that states focus on increasing investigations, regulations, and reporting on detention facilities instead of eliminating them.</p>
<p>It is likely that the federal government will fight AB 32 in court. However, California’s state Senate Judiciary Committee has <a href=”https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2019/10/california-newsom-private-prison-ban/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>predicted</a> that the state would win such a challenge. These developments in California may even spark similar legislation in other parts of the country.</p>
<p>Increased oversight of immigration detention centers—both private and public—is critical to ensure that people are treated humanely and are afforded meaningful due process.</p>
<!– AddThis Advanced Settings above via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Advanced Settings below via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Share Buttons above via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Share Buttons below via filter on the_content –><div class=”at-below-post addthis_tool” data-url=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/10/16/california-bans-private-prisons-immigration-detention-centers/”></div><!– AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content –><!– AddThis Related Posts below via filter on the_content –><div class=”at-below-post-recommended addthis_tool”></div><!– AddThis Related Posts generic via filter on the_content –> <p>

</p>
</div>

<p>This post originally appeared on <a href=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/10/16/california-bans-private-prisons-immigration-detention-centers/#.XajH8ehKiUk” target=”_blank”>Immigration Impact</a>. Reprinted with permission.</p>

</span>

<hr/><h4>
<a name=”bio”></a>
About The Author<br/>
</h4>

<!–AUTHOR BIO START–>

<p>
<b>Katy Murdza</b> is the Advocacy Manager for the Dilley Pro Bono Project at the American Immigration Council, where she advocates for asylum-seeking mothers and children on issues including medical care, pregnancy, family separation, and access to counsel. Before beginning this position in May 2017, Katy earned a Master’s degree in International Policy and Development from the Middlebury Institute of International Studies. She previously assisted migrants on the U.S.-Mexico border with No More Deaths and served as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Panama.

</p>
<!–END AUTHOR BIO–>
<p><hr/>
<div class=”ilwFinePrint”>The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of <span itemprop=”publisher” itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Organization”>
<span itemprop=”name”>ILW.COM</span></span>.</div></p>
</div>
{$inline_image

Filed Under: Uncategorised

You May Also Be Interested In:

Legal Alert Title

May 11 – Permanent Residency, House Bill

Article: Obtaining I-551 Stamp as Evidence of Conditional Lawful Permanent Residency during COVID-19 By Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP

Article: Stuck Abroad And Unable To Return To The U.S. Within 180 Days? By David H. Nachman, Esq., Michael Phulwani, Esq. and Ludka Zimovcak, Esq.

May 8 – Travel Restrictions, COVID-19

May 7 – Top Articles And News For April 2020

Article: Recommendations for U.S.C.I.S. Reopening Offices during Covid-19 By Alan Lee, Esq.

Article: COVID-19 Exacerbates Form I-829 Processing Pain for EB-5 Investors, Mandamus Lawsuits Growing in Popularity By Matt Galati

May 6 – Healthcare Immigration Now

Previous Post: « Oct 16 – Public Charge, Refugees
Next Post: News: USCIS Published Special Immigrant Juvenile Petitions »

Primary Sidebar

Have a Quick Question?

Send us a message and one of our immigration attorneys will respond to you within 24 hours.

Footer

Martin Jolic and Bratton LLC (formerly known as Sharon & Kálnoki LLC) is a full service Cleveland-based immigration law practice. We offer representation for almost all immigrant and nonimmigrant processes to clients worldwide.

Phone: (216) 328-9878
Fax: (216) 328-9879
Email: info@mjbimmigration.com

6050 Oak Tree Blvd., Suite 250
Independence, Ohio 44131

AILA Member Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Site Footer

Attorney advertising. This website is informational only. Information provided herein does not address any specific set of individual facts. Each immigration case is unique and nothing on this or associated pages, documents, forms, comments, e-mails, articles or other communication constitutes legal advice for any individual case or situation. Information provided on this site is not intended as a substitute for legal advice directed to a particular set of circumstances. Legal advice on specific, individual cases should be obtained from an experienced immigration attorney. In exchange for using this site to gather information, you agree not to hold any person involved in the preparation and presentation of this site responsible or liable, either directly or indirectly, for any damages whatsoever that may arise from the use, misuse, and/or reliance on anything contained within this site. Viewing or using information presented on this website is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship will be created only upon the express agreement of the parties.

Copyright © 2021