• Home
  • About Us
    • Stacy E. Cozart Martin
    • Michael M. Jolic
    • Scott Bratton
    • Staff
  • Services
    • Non-Immigrant Visas
      • E-1/E-2 Visas
      • H-1B Visas
      • H-1B visas for Physicians
      • H-2B Visas
      • J-1 Visa Waivers
      • L-1A and L-1B Non-immigrant Visas
      • O-1 Visa
      • The TN for Professionals
    • Immigrant Visas
      • EB-11 Alien of Extraordinary Ability
      • EB-12 Outstanding Professors or Researchers
      • Multi-National Executive or Manager Category
      • Immigrant Investors/Employment Creation Visas
      • Immigration Issues for Physicians
      • National Interest Waivers (NIW)
      • National Interest Waiver for Physicians Working in Medically Underserved Areas
      • Permanent Residency based on Labor Certification (PERM)
      • I-9 Services
    • Asylum, Deportation, Removal and Crimmigration
      • Asylum
      • Removal Proceedings
      • Crimmigration
      • Bond
      • Appeals – Board of Immigration Appeals
      • Federal Appeals
      • Federal Litigation in District Courts
      • I-601A/I-212
      • Motion to Reopen
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Mobile Menu

Schedule A Consultation Now!

Give us a call to speak with an immigration attorney.

(216) 328-9878

  • Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Speak with an Immigration Attorney  (216) 328-9878

MJB Immigration

Immigration Attorneys

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Non-Immigrant Visas
      • E-1/E-2 Visas
      • H-1B Visas
      • H-1B Visas for Physicians
      • H-2B Visas
      • J-1 Visa Waivers
      • L-1A and L-1B Visas
      • O-1 Visas
      • The TN for Professionals
    • Immigrant Visas
      • EB-11 Visas
      • EB-12 Visas
      • Multi-National Executive or Manager Category
      • Immigrant Investors/Employment Creation Visas
      • Immigration Issues for Physicians
      • National Interest Waivers (NIW)
      • National Interest Waiver for Physicians Working in Medically Underserved Areas
      • Permanent Residency based on Labor Certification (PERM)
      • I-9 Services
    • Asylum, Deportation, Removal and Crimmigration
      • Asylum
      • Removal Proceedings
      • Crimmigration
      • Bond
      • Appeals – Board of Immigration Appeals
      • Federal Appeals
      • Federal Litigation in District Courts
      • I-601A/I-212
      • Motion to Reopen
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Article: Eb-5 Visa Fraud Claim Dismissed With Prejudice By Peter J. Biging & Jennifer H. Feldscher

December 9, 2019

<div itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Article”>
<h3 itemprop=”name”>
<!–ARTICLE TITLE START–>
Eb-5 Visa Fraud Claim Dismissed With Prejudice
<!–END ARTICLE TITLE–>
</h3><h4><i>by <a href=”http://discuss.ilw.com/articles/articles/392238-article-eb-5-visa-fraud-claim-dismissed-with-prejudice-by-peter-j-biging-jennifer-h-feldscher#bio”>
<span itemprop=”author” itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Person”>
<span itemprop=”name”>
<!–AUTHOR NAME START–>
Peter J. Biging & Jennifer H. Feldscher
<!–END AUTHOR NAME–>
</span></span>
</a></i></h4><br/>

<p>
Mona Shah &amp; Associates Global, a corporate immigration law
firm headquartered in Manhattan, won a dismissal with prejudice
in New York Supreme Court, bringing to rest a highly publicized
lawsuit that had alleged legal malpractice, fraud, and breach
of fiduciary duty in connection with the plaintiff’s investment
in an c Visa Program project to obtain permanent residence
status in the U.S.
</p>
<p>
On January 17, 2019 plaintiff Wei Ding Fan, a Chinese national,
brought a suit in the Southern District of New York against the
law firm Mona Shah &amp; Associates PLLC and Ms. Shah,
alleging, among other things, misrepresentation of the EB-5
investment, misrepresentation that he would obtain his green
card within two years, and that Shah solicited his business
without disclosing or obtaining a waiver of an alleged conflict
of interest. However, at plaintiff’s request the action was
voluntarily dismissed after questions were raised about whether
the court had subject matter jurisdiction over the case. Fan
subsequently brought the suit again in New York state court
asserting the same claims. In the New York State Court
complaint, covered
<a
href=”https://www.law360.com/articles/1121572/ny-firm-accused-of-misrepresenting-eb-5-visa-investment-“
>
in
</a>
<a
href=”https://www.law360.com/articles/1121572/ny-firm-accused-of-misrepresenting-eb-5-visa-investment-“
>
<em>Law360</em>
</a>
, Fan demanded the law firm repay his $550,000 investment.
</p>
<p>
<a
href=”https://www.goldbergsegalla.com/our-team/peter-j-biging”
>
Peter J. Biging
</a>
and
<a
href=”https://www.goldbergsegalla.com/our-team/jennifer-h-feldscher”
>
Jennifer H. Feldscher
</a>
, partners in Goldberg Segalla’s Manhattan office and members
of the
<a
href=”https://www.goldbergsegalla.com/practices/management-and-professional-liability”
>
Management and Professional Liability
</a>
practice, represented the Shah Defendants. After Goldberg
Segalla moved to dismiss on the documentary evidence of the
offering materials and Fan’s retainer agreement—which expressly
disclosed Shah’s representation of the company in which Fan was
going to be making the investment and included an express
waiver of any conflicts—and sought sanctions for the filing of
a frivolous complaint, Fan sought to again voluntarily dismiss
the action without prejudice, and on April 16 submitted a
stipulation of discontinuance of the action. In oral argument,
Jennifer stated that because the action had now been twice
voluntarily discontinued, pursuant to New York Civil Practice
Law Section 3217(c) the latest voluntary dismissal constituted
a dismissal with prejudice. The court agreed, and issued a
decision and order dismissing the action with prejudice on
September 23, 2019.
</p>
<p>
“I think justice was ultimately served, as this meritless
lawsuit cannot be further pursued,” Peter said. “But I hope
that the plaintiff’s choice to withdraw his complaint when
confronted with a motion to dismiss and a request for
sanctions—at the cost of having the claims dismissed with
prejudice—will receive as much attention as the complaint
received when it was filed.”
</p>
<p>
<strong>
More about Goldberg Segalla’s Management and Professional
Liability practice:
</strong>
</p>
<p>
Attorneys in Goldberg Segalla’s nationwide
<a
href=”https://www.goldbergsegalla.com/practices/management-and-professional-liability”
>
Management and Professional Liability
</a>
practice leverage hindsight, foresight, and insight to deliver
cost-efficient and strategic legal solutions for our
clients—every time. Our experience serving clients across
countless professions and industries includes aggressively
defending plaintiffs’ claims; minimizing damages from
legitimate errors, mistakes, and accidents; and educating and
preparing professionals to meet evolving and emerging
industry-specific risks.
</p>
<p>
Management and Professional Liability Vice Chair
<a
href=”https://www.goldbergsegalla.com/our-team/peter-j-biging”
>
Peter J. Biging
</a>
heads up the
<a
href=”https://www.goldbergsegalla.com/industries/lawyers-and-law-firms”
>
Lawyers and Law Firms
</a>
group within the practice. Peter and his team counsel and
defend other lawyers against legal malpractice claims, in
disciplinary proceedings where licenses are in jeopardy, and
against all kinds of other claims which are often asserted by
people who weren’t even the lawyers’ clients. We have defended
attorneys who practice in all areas of the law, including
personal injury, commercial litigation, mergers and
acquisitions, banking and finance, debt collection, estate
planning, bankruptcy, real estate, immigration, criminal law,
and matrimonial law, to name just a few.
</p>

<hr/><h4>
<a name=”bio”></a>
About The Author<br/>
</h4>

<!–AUTHOR BIO START–>

<a href=”http://mshahlaw.com/about-us/” target=”_blank”>Peter J. Biging & Jennifer H. Feldscher</a> are partners in Goldberg Segalla’s Manhattan office and members of the Management and Professional Liability practice

<hr/>
<div class=”ilwFinePrint”>The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of <span itemprop=”publisher” itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Organization”>
<span itemprop=”name”>ILW.COM</span></span>.</div></p>
</div>
{$inline_image

Filed Under: Uncategorised

You May Also Be Interested In:

Legal Alert Title

May 11 – Permanent Residency, House Bill

Article: Obtaining I-551 Stamp as Evidence of Conditional Lawful Permanent Residency during COVID-19 By Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP

Article: Stuck Abroad And Unable To Return To The U.S. Within 180 Days? By David H. Nachman, Esq., Michael Phulwani, Esq. and Ludka Zimovcak, Esq.

May 8 – Travel Restrictions, COVID-19

May 7 – Top Articles And News For April 2020

Article: Recommendations for U.S.C.I.S. Reopening Offices during Covid-19 By Alan Lee, Esq.

Article: COVID-19 Exacerbates Form I-829 Processing Pain for EB-5 Investors, Mandamus Lawsuits Growing in Popularity By Matt Galati

May 6 – Healthcare Immigration Now

Previous Post: « Dec 6 – USCIS vs Rural Jobs
Next Post: Article: USCIS Announces Implementation of H-1B Electronic Registration Process for Fiscal Year 2021 Cap Season »

Primary Sidebar

Have a Quick Question?

Send us a message and one of our immigration attorneys will respond to you within 24 hours.

Footer

Martin Jolic and Bratton LLC (formerly known as Sharon & Kálnoki LLC) is a full service Cleveland-based immigration law practice. We offer representation for almost all immigrant and nonimmigrant processes to clients worldwide.

Phone: (216) 328-9878
Fax: (216) 328-9879
Email: info@mjbimmigration.com

6050 Oak Tree Blvd., Suite 250
Independence, Ohio 44131

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Site Footer

Attorney advertising. This website is informational only. Information provided herein does not address any specific set of individual facts. Each immigration case is unique and nothing on this or associated pages, documents, forms, comments, e-mails, articles or other communication constitutes legal advice for any individual case or situation. Information provided on this site is not intended as a substitute for legal advice directed to a particular set of circumstances. Legal advice on specific, individual cases should be obtained from an experienced immigration attorney. In exchange for using this site to gather information, you agree not to hold any person involved in the preparation and presentation of this site responsible or liable, either directly or indirectly, for any damages whatsoever that may arise from the use, misuse, and/or reliance on anything contained within this site. Viewing or using information presented on this website is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship will be created only upon the express agreement of the parties.

Copyright © 2021