• Home
  • About Us
    • Stacy E. Cozart Martin
    • Michael M. Jolic
    • Scott Bratton
    • Staff
  • Services
    • Non-Immigrant Visas
      • E-1/E-2 Visas
      • H-1B Visas
      • H-1B visas for Physicians
      • H-2B Visas
      • J-1 Visa Waivers
      • L-1A and L-1B Non-immigrant Visas
      • O-1 Visa
      • The TN for Professionals
    • Immigrant Visas
      • EB-11 Alien of Extraordinary Ability
      • EB-12 Outstanding Professors or Researchers
      • Multi-National Executive or Manager Category
      • Immigrant Investors/Employment Creation Visas
      • Immigration Issues for Physicians
      • National Interest Waivers (NIW)
      • National Interest Waiver for Physicians Working in Medically Underserved Areas
      • Permanent Residency based on Labor Certification (PERM)
      • I-9 Services
    • Asylum, Deportation, Removal and Crimmigration
      • Asylum
      • Removal Proceedings
      • Crimmigration
      • Bond
      • Appeals – Board of Immigration Appeals
      • Federal Appeals
      • Federal Litigation in District Courts
      • I-601A/I-212
      • Motion to Reopen
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Mobile Menu

Schedule A Consultation Now!

Give us a call to speak with an immigration attorney.

(216) 328-9878

  • Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Speak with an Immigration Attorney  (216) 328-9878

MJB Immigration

Immigration Attorneys

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Non-Immigrant Visas
      • E-1/E-2 Visas
      • H-1B Visas
      • H-1B Visas for Physicians
      • H-2B Visas
      • J-1 Visa Waivers
      • L-1A and L-1B Visas
      • O-1 Visas
      • The TN for Professionals
    • Immigrant Visas
      • EB-11 Visas
      • EB-12 Visas
      • Multi-National Executive or Manager Category
      • Immigrant Investors/Employment Creation Visas
      • Immigration Issues for Physicians
      • National Interest Waivers (NIW)
      • National Interest Waiver for Physicians Working in Medically Underserved Areas
      • Permanent Residency based on Labor Certification (PERM)
      • I-9 Services
    • Asylum, Deportation, Removal and Crimmigration
      • Asylum
      • Removal Proceedings
      • Crimmigration
      • Bond
      • Appeals – Board of Immigration Appeals
      • Federal Appeals
      • Federal Litigation in District Courts
      • I-601A/I-212
      • Motion to Reopen
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Article: Trump Implemented Family Separation After Government Officials Raised Red Flags By Emily Creighton

December 20, 2019

<div itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Article”>
<h3 itemprop=”name”>
<!–ARTICLE TITLE START–>
Trump Implemented Family Separation After Government Officials Raised Red Flags
<!–END ARTICLE TITLE–>
</h3><h4><i>by <a href=”http://discuss.ilw.com/articles/articles/392273-article-employer%E2%80%99s-at-a-glance-guide-to-uscis%E2%80%99-new-h-1b-lottery-process-by-charina-garcia-and-bernard-wolfsdorf#bio”>
<span itemprop=”author” itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Person”>
<span itemprop=”name”>
<!–AUTHOR NAME START–>
Emily Creighton
<!–END AUTHOR NAME–>
</span></span>
</a></i></h4><br/>

<span itemprop=”articleBody”>

<div class=”post-thumbnail header”>
<img src=”http://immigrationimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/immigration-impact-family-separation-border-1280×640.jpg” alt=”Trump Implemented Family Separation After Government Officials Raised Red Flags”> </div>

<div class=”post-wrap”>
<div class=”post-content entry-content”>
<div class=”at-above-post addthis_tool” data-url=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/12/17/trump-knew-family-separation-harmful/”></div><p>Government officials were aware of the harm family separation would cause and were critical of the practice years before the Trump administration established it as an official policy.</p>
<p>Advocates unearthed this and other details about the “zero tolerance” policy in response to a series of <a href=”https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/foia/family-separation-foia-request” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests</a> filed in April 2018.</p>
<p>The FOIA <a href=”https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/foia/family-separation-foia-request” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>requests</a> have uncovered documents that reveal a practice of family separations as early as 2016. These documents include government officials’ emails and incident reports.</p>
<p>The documents are significant because they show that internal efforts to raise red flags went ignored. They also reveal that oversight efforts did nothing to deter the administration’s widespread implementation of family separation in the spring and summer of 2018.</p>
<p><a href=”https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/foia_documents/family_separation_foia_request_hhs_production_records_of_reunification_efforts.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>Emails</a> show the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) officials’ knowledge of and frustration with the practice of family separation as early September 2016. In an email chain discussing the process for reunifying parents and children, one senior official stated, “[t]he best that could happen is… to stop the practice of family separation.”</p>
<p>Officials also attempted to <a href=”https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/foia_documents/family_separation_foia_request_hhs_production_records_of_reunification_efforts.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>document family separation</a> in 2016 by submitting significant incident reports, historically used by the agency to document instances of child abuse, misconduct, or negligence. But these documents could not paint a full picture. Government employees generally had little information about the children in their care.</p>
<p>In one heartbreaking example, a report stated that a three-year-old was separated from her father on an unknown date and location. The child was unable to convey information as she did not speak English or Spanish.</p>
<p><a href=”https://publicintegrity.org/inequality-poverty-opportunity/immigration/migrant-children-family-separations” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>Recent reporting</a> by the Center for Public Integrity—supported in part by the FOIA documents requested by the American Immigration Council, National Immigrant Justice Center, Kids in Need of Defense, Women’s Refugee Commission, and Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project—examines what the administration knew before deciding to embrace zero tolerance.</p>
<p>The Center for Public Integrity pointed out that a Homeland Security advisory committee issued a report condemning family separation in 2016. This was around the same time HHS officials sent emails criticizing the program.</p>
<p>The report urged the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to find alternatives to family separation when, for example, a parent might be too ill to care for a child or the child might be hospitalized. The report did not envision how widespread family separation would become. But it criticized the act of separating a family, nonetheless.</p>
<p>Other <a href=”https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/foia_documents/family_separation_foia_request_hhs_production_records_of_reunification_efforts.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>documents</a> demonstrate HHS officials’ urgency in dealing with separated families. This included attempts to reunify, repatriate, and maintain contact between separated family members in the chaos of zero tolerance.</p>
<p><a href=”https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2019-11/OIG-20-06-Nov19.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>Oversight offices</a> have consistently determined that agencies were woefully unprepared to track and reunify families before, during, and after zero tolerance. The <a href=”https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2019-11/OIG-20-06-Nov19.pdf” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>FOIA records</a> drive this point home.</p>
<p>Agencies’ lack of technology and coordination meant they could not easily track and reunify families. But it is becoming increasingly clear that agencies <em>did</em> understand how harmful the policy would be to children and families.</p>
<p>Piecing together what agency and administration officials knew in the years leading up to zero tolerance continues to be a critically important part of the narrative. Much still needs to be revealed.</p>

<p>This post originally appeared on <a href=”http://immigrationimpact.com/2019/12/17/trump-knew-family-separation-harmful/#.XfzorPxOmUk” target=”_blank”>Immigration Impact</a>. Reprinted with permission.</p>

</span>

<hr/><h4>
<a name=”bio”></a>
About The Author<br/>
</h4>

<!–AUTHOR BIO START–>

<p>
<b>Emily Creighton</b> is the Directing Attorney for Transparency at the American Immigration Council. She oversees the development of the Council’s transparency-related litigation, amicus briefs, practice advisories and advocacy, including maintaining an active docket of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) cases. She seeks to uncover agency records that will advance litigation, advocacy and research efforts to combat abuses at the border and unlawful enforcement tactics, promote fair and just removal processes, and shed light on unlawful adjudications of immigration benefits. She also seeks to strengthen collaboration among organizations involved in open government work in the immigration space. Prior to her new role at the Council, she served as the Senior Advisor on Humanitarian Programs at the CIS Ombudsman’s Office from 2016 to 2017. Previous to that, she was a Senior Staff Attorney with the Council. As a staff attorney, she engaged in impact litigation, representing amicus curiae in immigration cases in federal court and before the Board of Immigration Appeals, and authored numerous practice advisories. Emily holds a J.D. from American University Washington College of Law and a B.A. from Boston College.
</p>

<!–END AUTHOR BIO–>
<p><hr/>
<div class=”ilwFinePrint”>The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of <span itemprop=”publisher” itemscope itemtype=”http://schema.org/Organization”>
<span itemprop=”name”>ILW.COM</span></span>.</div></p>
</div>
{$inline_image

Filed Under: Uncategorised

You May Also Be Interested In:

Legal Alert Title

May 11 – Permanent Residency, House Bill

Article: Obtaining I-551 Stamp as Evidence of Conditional Lawful Permanent Residency during COVID-19 By Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP

Article: Stuck Abroad And Unable To Return To The U.S. Within 180 Days? By David H. Nachman, Esq., Michael Phulwani, Esq. and Ludka Zimovcak, Esq.

May 8 – Travel Restrictions, COVID-19

May 7 – Top Articles And News For April 2020

Article: Recommendations for U.S.C.I.S. Reopening Offices during Covid-19 By Alan Lee, Esq.

Article: COVID-19 Exacerbates Form I-829 Processing Pain for EB-5 Investors, Mandamus Lawsuits Growing in Popularity By Matt Galati

May 6 – Healthcare Immigration Now

Previous Post: « Dec 19 – Asylum and Trump Impeachment
Next Post: News: Update on Travel by Temporary Protected Status Beneficiaries In Removal Proceedings »

Primary Sidebar

Have a Quick Question?

Send us a message and one of our immigration attorneys will respond to you within 24 hours.

Footer

Martin Jolic and Bratton LLC (formerly known as Sharon & Kálnoki LLC) is a full service Cleveland-based immigration law practice. We offer representation for almost all immigrant and nonimmigrant processes to clients worldwide.

Phone: (216) 328-9878
Fax: (216) 328-9879
Email: info@mjbimmigration.com

6050 Oak Tree Blvd., Suite 250
Independence, Ohio 44131

AILA Member Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Consultation
  • News
  • Contact

Site Footer

Attorney advertising. This website is informational only. Information provided herein does not address any specific set of individual facts. Each immigration case is unique and nothing on this or associated pages, documents, forms, comments, e-mails, articles or other communication constitutes legal advice for any individual case or situation. Information provided on this site is not intended as a substitute for legal advice directed to a particular set of circumstances. Legal advice on specific, individual cases should be obtained from an experienced immigration attorney. In exchange for using this site to gather information, you agree not to hold any person involved in the preparation and presentation of this site responsible or liable, either directly or indirectly, for any damages whatsoever that may arise from the use, misuse, and/or reliance on anything contained within this site. Viewing or using information presented on this website is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship will be created only upon the express agreement of the parties.

Copyright © 2021